This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePage Count
|
10.0 pts
High Performance
Student submits 3-4 pages.
|
5.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Students submits less than three pages. OR Student submits more than four pages.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposal of Solution/Strategies
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts
High Performance
Student provides a brief, but thorough summary of the problem and available solution strategies. Student clearly advances which of the solution strategies they propose to help solve the problem.
|
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student touches on the problem and solution strategies, but the summary may be superficial and/or light on content. It may be unclear which of the solution strategies the student is advancing to help solve the problem.
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student does not summarize the problem or propose any solutions/strategies.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAffects of Solutions
|
15.0 to >12.0 pts
High Performance
Student substantively addresses the affects of solutions on adverse effects, stakeholders, causes, and drivers of their selected problem. Discussion is detailed, supported with examples, and noted for creative connections to selected sources to highlight salient points.
|
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student superficially addresses the affects of solutions on adverse effects, stakeholders, causes, and drivers of their selected problem. OR, Student addresses some, but not all, of the requested areas. Discussion applies some detail, and uses a few examples, but support could be strengthened.
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student does not address the affects of solutions.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of Solutions
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
High Performance
Student shows evidence of both critical thinking and thoughtful critique in the evaluation of their proposed solutions. Evaluation occurs across social, ecological, cultural, and technical spheres. Discussion is logical and insightful, with reasoning well justified and supported.
|
16.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student does evaluate proposed solutions, but there may be little evidence of deep critical thinking. Critique remains surface-level, or “obvious.” Student may not evaluate across all the four requested spheres. Discussion is adequate and applies some detail, but could be strengthened.
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student does not evaluate proposed solutions.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTrade-offs
|
15.0 to >12.0 pts
High Performance
Student identifies a variety of trade-offs that may exist in implementing their proposed solutions. Discussion is noted for depth of analysis and creative thinking/extrapolation.
|
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student identifies some trade-offs that may exist in implementing their proposed solutions, but the discussion may be superficial. There is little evidence of creative thinking/extrapolation or deep analysis .
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student does not discuss the trade-offs of their proposed solutions.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts
High Performance
Student synthesized and cited many sources (at least six external, authoritative sources and four class sources), making complex, clear and creative connections to materials to justify and support discussion.
|
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student synthesized and cited less than the requested number of sources (six external sources and four class sources).
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student does not use any external academic sources or class sources.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Citations
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts
High Performance
Student provides proper citations for most all sources used. Student also provides a complete ‘Reference’ list at the end of their submission.
|
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Student provides few in-text citations for sources used OR improper citations noted throughout post. ‘Reference’ list missing, incomplete, or noted with many errors.
|
0.0 pts
Low Performance
Student provides no citations.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, Punctuation
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts
High Performance
Minimal, if any errors, in grammar, spelling, and punctuation throughout reflection. Errors do not unduly inhibit communication of the student’s message.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Intermediate Performance
Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation problems noted. These errors are overly distracting to the communication of the student’s message.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
Total Points: 100.0
|